Projected · remaining schedule
82 team games · 66 game sample- PTS
- 21.4
- SOG
- 97.4
- G
- 8.8
- A
- 12.6
- PPP
- 2.6
- HIT
- 11.3
- BLK
- 37.7
- PIM
- 38.5
Each figure is this player's recency-weighted per-game rate over 66 real games × their team's 82 scheduled games. Availability is not projected — injuries, scratches and trades are not modelled anywhere in this project, so the team's schedule is the multiplier, not a forecast of how many games this player will dress for. League board.
What carries into 2026-27
a forecast, not a resultMost of this cold run probably won’t repeat
Among forwards · 973 ranked
Production
Style & role
Percentile against 973 forwards, 2025-26. Shrunk rate is the per-game rate the rank was computed from, pulled toward the league mean by sample size so a short career does not read as an elite one — so it sits closer to average than the rate actually recorded. This skater’s sample is 66 games. Further right means more, not better: hits, blocks and penalty minutes describe a role, not quality.
Observed rates
per game · recency-weighted, not shrunk · 66 games incl. playoffs- PTS
- 0.26
- G
- 0.11
- A
- 0.15
- SOG
- 1.18
- PPP
- 0.03
- HIT
- 0.12
- BLK
- 0.45
- PIM
- 0.47
Season totals
regular season| Season | GP | G | A | P | P/GP | SOG | TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | 66 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.26 | 78 | 12:56 |
Last 10 · game log
| Date | Opp | SOG | G | A | PPP | HIT | BLK | PIM | TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16 | @ COL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 13:31 |
| Apr 15 | @ VGK | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 15:15 |
| Apr 13 | vs LAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11:20 |
| Apr 11 | vs CGY | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11:42 |
| Apr 9 | vs VGK | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11:01 |
| Apr 7 | @ MIN | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13:46 |
| Apr 6 | @ WPG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12:43 |
| Apr 4 | vs CHI | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11:59 |
| Apr 2 | vs UTA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13:04 |
| Mar 31 | @ EDM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17:17 |
One threshold, applied to all 10: each figure counts how many of the 10 games above would have cleared the Apr 6 posted line. It is not a record against 10 separate lines — this player was priced once, and games after that date are measured against the same number.
Finishing — goals above expected
open play, regular season| Season | xG | G | GAx | GP | Att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | 11.8 | 7 | minus 4.8 goals above expected | 59 | 131 |
How the 2026-27 projection is made
a forecast, not a resultFinishing persists year over year, but only partly. That share is measured over five seasons of skaters clearing the same 100-attempt floor, and what does not carry regresses toward the rate for the player's position.
Shot volume is not projected, so the goal figure assumes the same number of attempts. A persistent gap means the skater reliably scores above what this model expects — which may be finishing skill or may be shots the model under-rates, and the measurement cannot separate the two. Running cold is a statement about the season just played, not about talent.
This projection is written to a prediction log on the night it is produced, so it can be scored against what actually happens rather than restated later.
Production by strength
G-A-P, regular season| Season | Even strength | Power play | Shorthanded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | 6 goals, 9 assists, 15 points | 1 goal, 1 assist, 2 points | 0-0-0 |
Shot locations
131 attempts · 7 goals · 2025-26Markets · Apr 6
modeled projectionsPer-game rates are recency-weighted over this player's game log. Expected goals come from the xG model over open-play unblocked attempts; totals are not directly comparable across seasons. Every market — anytime goals, assists, power-play points, SOG, hits, blocks and PIMs — is a modeled projection. Every number on this page was worked out overnight and is only read here, never recalculated while you wait.