ODDPUCK
Between seasonsProjections liveLatest sheet Sat, Apr 11, 2026
insights

Does the projection ordering hold up?

Projection ordering carries information well beyond the top-ranked players. Evidence varies by statistic, season and rank region, and many shallower-region negatives are inconclusive because the available data cannot resolve the preregistered practical effect.

Points, Goals and Shots on Goal are three separately preregistered surfaces, reported independently. They are not combined, ranked against each other, or summarised into one score.

Points: verdict by season and rank region, at a glance
Season1-2526-5051-100101-200201-350351-550551+
2021–22InconclusiveInconclusiveInconclusiveOrdering evidenceOrdering evidenceNo ordering evidenceOrdering evidence
2022–23Ordering evidenceInconclusiveInconclusiveOrdering evidenceOrdering evidenceOrdering evidenceNo ordering evidence
2023–24Ordering evidenceInconclusiveInconclusiveOrdering evidenceOrdering evidenceOrdering evidenceEvidence, below threshold
2024–25InconclusiveInconclusiveInconclusiveOrdering evidenceOrdering evidenceOrdering evidenceNo ordering evidence
2025–26Ordering evidenceOrdering evidenceInconclusiveOrdering evidenceOrdering evidenceOrdering evidenceOrdering evidence

Ordering evidenceEvidence, below thresholdInverted orderingInverted, below thresholdNo ordering evidenceInconclusive — the design could not have told

Full statistical results

Every cell above, with the figure behind it: s, its 95% interval, and whether the region could have resolved the preregistered effect at all. “How to read a cell” is below the table.

Points: ordering verdict by season and rank region
SeasonRanks 1-25Ranks 26-50Ranks 51-100Ranks 101-200Ranks 201-350Ranks 351-550Ranks 551+
2021–22
Inconclusive
s 0.498
95% interval 0.4100.586
◇ not resolvable
Inconclusive
s 0.560
95% interval 0.4530.662
◇ not resolvable
Inconclusive
s 0.557
95% interval 0.4970.614
◇ not resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.587
95% interval 0.5440.633
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.598
95% interval 0.5610.635
◆ resolvable
No ordering evidence
s 0.528
95% interval 0.4990.558
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.587
95% interval 0.5500.623
◆ resolvable
2022–23
Ordering evidence
s 0.684
95% interval 0.5720.787
◇ not resolvable
Inconclusive
s 0.560
95% interval 0.4520.669
◇ not resolvable
Inconclusive
s 0.513
95% interval 0.4480.575
◇ not resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.627
95% interval 0.5900.663
◇ not resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.572
95% interval 0.5350.612
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.577
95% interval 0.5470.607
◆ resolvable
No ordering evidence
s 0.526
95% interval 0.4800.570
◆ resolvable
2023–24
Ordering evidence
s 0.727
95% interval 0.6290.809
◇ not resolvable
Inconclusive
s 0.480
95% interval 0.4010.566
◇ not resolvable
Inconclusive
s 0.565
95% interval 0.5060.624
◇ not resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.592
95% interval 0.5510.633
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.594
95% interval 0.5560.630
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.596
95% interval 0.5670.624
◆ resolvable
Evidence, below threshold
s 0.550
95% interval 0.5100.589
◆ resolvable
2024–25
Inconclusive
s 0.589
95% interval 0.4460.703
◇ not resolvable
Inconclusive
s 0.545
95% interval 0.4440.646
◇ not resolvable
Inconclusive
s 0.551
95% interval 0.4960.605
◇ not resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.594
95% interval 0.5500.636
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.595
95% interval 0.5650.625
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.584
95% interval 0.5540.615
◆ resolvable
No ordering evidence
s 0.534
95% interval 0.4910.578
◆ resolvable
2025–26
Ordering evidence
s 0.695
95% interval 0.5940.781
◇ not resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.615
95% interval 0.5280.698
◇ not resolvable
Inconclusive
s 0.544
95% interval 0.4730.616
◇ not resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.605
95% interval 0.5640.644
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.589
95% interval 0.5550.624
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.608
95% interval 0.5810.636
◆ resolvable
Ordering evidence
s 0.581
95% interval 0.5430.619
◆ resolvable

How to read a cell

s
The share of correctly ordered player pairs, aggregated equally over three in-season cutoffs. 0.5 is the value a shuffled board would produce.
95% interval
Uncertainty around the observed s. It says how precisely s is estimated — it is not a significance test and played no part in the verdict.
The verdict
Comes from comparing sagainst that region’s own shuffled-board range — a separate quantity from the interval above, answering is this distinguishable from no ordering at all?
◇ not resolvable, and why “inconclusive” is not a negative
Some regions carry too few comparisons for the method to detect an effect of the size declared in advance, even if one existed. There, a non-finding is reported as inconclusive — meaning the design could not have told. It does not mean the ordering failed.

Five seasons, three preregistered statistics, seven rank regions. Method and thresholds were fixed before the data was computed. Computed at revision 44ddb299004f.