Skip to content

BOS

Boston Bruins

Rated #20 of 32 by xG-Elo in 2026-27

2026-27 regular season

Record
9 wins, 4 regulation losses, 1 overtime losses
Points
19
Points rank
#4 of 32
Goal diff
+18

Every club’s 2026-27 standings

The model’s read · 2026-27

Rated 16 spots lower than the standings

  • #4 of 32In points
  • #20 of 32By xG-Elo
Where the model disagrees most
How the rating works — it is built from expected-goal margin, not from results

xG-Elo moves game by game with the model’s expected-goals margin, never with the score or the standings, which is why it can disagree with a club’s points. That disagreement is the sentence above. Under 7 spots apart the two are read as in line: a display rule for the wording, not a test of whether a gap is real.

This club’s rating is 1494. Every club starts from 1500 and is pulled back toward it between seasons, so above 1500 is stronger than an average team and below it weaker.

2026-27 · 14 games · goals

Goal margin: expected and actual

The standings count goals and the rating counts only chances; the Boston Bruins scored more than their chances were worth, so the standings place them higher.

Expected goal margin0.0 · #17 of 32

Actual goal margin, same attempts+18 · #2 of 32

Gap +18.0 goals, actual minus expected

Scoring, against the model
+4.7More goals than its chances were worth
Goals allowed, against the model
−13.3Fewer than its opponents’ chances were worth
Compare with every club — where its two margins sit among the league’s

Expected goal margin0.0 · #17 of 32

Actual goal margin, same attempts+18 · #2 of 32

  • Expected, from chance quality
  • Actual
  • Another club
Every club’s two margins, 2026-27, in order of expected margin
#ClubExpectedActualGap
1CAR+21.6+21−0.7
2MIN+18.1+12−6.0
3NJD+13.8+5−8.8
4UTA+13.7+5−8.7
5VGK+13.3+10−3.4
6TBL+9.8+6−3.8
7DET+6.1−1−7.1
8COL+5.1+13+7.9
9EDM+4.3+13+8.7
10FLA+3.9+2−1.9
11DAL+3.6+5+1.4
12NYR+2.3+2−0.3
13BUF+1.6−6−7.6
14STL+1.5+2+0.5
15MTL+0.5+3+2.5
16WSH+0.3+6+5.7
17BOS0.0+18+18.0
18OTT−0.9−2−1.1
19LAK−1.8−8−6.2
20NSH−2.7−4−1.3
21PIT−3.0−1+2.0
22NYI−3.5+5+8.6
23CGY−4.8−17−12.2
24TOR−5.2+7+12.2
25WPG−6.3−10−3.7
26CBJ−6.8−9−2.2
27ANA−7.9−7+0.9
28SEA−8.4+2+10.4
29CHI−13.6−21−7.4
30SJS−15.8−7+8.8
31PHI−16.2−21−4.8
32VAN−22.5−23−0.5

Every club’s expected goals and goals, for and against, are on the Teams page.

How these are counted — open-play unblocked attempts at every strength; not the standings’ goal totals

The reading in full

This points to goals rather than chances. The club’s goal margin ran 18.0 ahead of its expected-goal margin: measured against the model alone, it scored 4.7 more goals than its chances were worth and allowed 13.3 fewer than its opponents’ chances were worth. The standings are built from results, which count those goals; the rating counts only the chances, so it places the Boston Bruins lower.

The rating is built from expected goals, the chances a club makes and allows. The standings are built from results, and results from goals. These are the two ledgers side by side, over the same attempts.

Both margins count the same pucks: open-play unblocked attempts, at every strength, with a recorded location. The actual margin is the goals on those attempts, so it leaves out penalty-shot goals and each shootout winner’s extra goal, which the standings count.

Raw, the Boston Bruins scored 4.7 more goals than their chances were worth and allowed 13.3 fewer than their opponents’ chances were worth so far in 2026-27. The scoring and allowed bars are these raw figures, measured against the model alone: the model’s league-wide level for the season being played is read once, after the season, so no average club is measured until then, and the league’s own level stays in each club’s figure. Goals allowed beyond the chances is goaltending, and whatever else the model does not see.

Expected goals and goals, Boston Bruins, 2026-27
LedgerForAgainst
Expected goals45.345.3
Goals on those attempts5032
Rating entering the season
1488 · #23 of 32
Rating entering its latest game
1494 · #20 of 32

The rating carries each club into a season from the last one, pulled back toward 1500, and then moves after every game by how far that game’s expected-goal margin beat or missed what the two clubs’ ratings predicted, home ice included. Its latest figure is the rating the club took into its most recent game.

What it cannot establish

Whether scoring or keeping out goals beyond expected is skill that will last, luck that will not, or chances the model reads wrong: nothing here tells the three apart. For skaters, finishing above expected has carried only partly into the following season — does finishing persist? These figures say which ledger the standings came from, not which ranking is right.

Regular season · per game · same attempts

Season trends

  • Expected
  • Actual
  • 2021-22: expected goal difference +0.56 per game, goal difference on the same attempts +0.40 per game, over 82 games
  • 2022-23: expected goal difference +0.57 per game, goal difference on the same attempts +1.54 per game, over 82 games
  • 2023-24: expected goal difference +0.07 per game, goal difference on the same attempts +0.49 per game, over 82 games
  • 2024-25: expected goal difference −0.19 per game, goal difference on the same attempts −0.60 per game, over 82 games
  • 2025-26: expected goal difference −0.33 per game, goal difference on the same attempts +0.26 per game, over 82 games
  • 2026-27 to date: expected goal difference 0.00 per game, goal difference on the same attempts +1.29 per game, over 14 games
Goal difference per game, expected (xGD) and actual (GD), using the same open-play attempts
How it is counted — not the standings’ goal difference

Each regular season, both figures count the same open-play unblocked attempts: expected goals for minus against, and the goals scored on those attempts for minus against, each divided by games played (GP). That is not the standings’ goal difference, which also counts penalty-shot goals and each shootout winner’s extra goal. The season to date is drawn on its own, joined to nothing.

Next game

Chicago Blackhawks at Boston Bruins

Sat, Oct 31 · 1:00 PM ET

Pre-game win chance

CHI 39%BOS 61%

Set Oct 31, 8:50 AM ET, before puck drop.

The model’s projection, not a betting recommendation. Its accuracy is modest (AUC 0.600, on a scale where 0.5 is a coin flip and 1.0 is perfect). That figure is measured on 2025-26, the season the rest adjustment was first seen in, so it describes that season rather than testing the model on games it had not seen.

Game preview

Last game · numbered by five-on-five time together

Lines from last game

Oct 29 at STL (St. Louis Blues). These are the lines that game was played with, not a projection of the next one.

Forwards

  1. Line 1ZachaPastrnakPeterka12:10 together at five-on-five
  2. Line 2MittelstadtHagensLindholm12:08 together at five-on-five
  3. Line 3JeannotKastelicPoitras7:46 together at five-on-five
  4. Line 4GeekieMintenKhusnutdinov7:01 together at five-on-five

Defence

  1. Pair 1LindholmMcAvoy21:05 together at five-on-five
  2. Pair 2ZadorovBorgen15:03 together at five-on-five
  3. Pair 3LohreiClifton13:28 together at five-on-five

Penalty kill

  1. PK1MintenJeannotZadorovClifton0:31 together killing a penalty

Goalie

Box score

Skaters
G
A
+/-
PIM
SH%
PPG
SHG
HIT
BLK
GV
TK
FOW
FOL
FO%
SHFT
TOI PP
TOI SH
0
0
+1
2
5
0.0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
—
27
23:56
2:05
0:34
0
0
+1
0
3
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
—
27
23:21
0:00
0:36
0
0
0
2
3
0.0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
—
22
21:28
2:32
0:00
0
0
−1
0
1
0.0
0
0
1
0
1
1
9
6
60.0
22
21:00
2:11
0:40
0
0
−1
0
1
0.0
0
0
6
1
0
0
0
0
—
25
19:05
0:05
1:27
0
0
−1
0
1
0.0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
—
20
18:28
1:50
0:11
0
0
0
0
3
0.0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0.0
19
18:19
1:49
0:09
0
0
−1
0
2
0.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
—
25
17:25
0:20
1:03
0
1
0
0
0
—
0
0
1
0
3
1
2
3
40.0
20
15:58
1:27
0:00
0
0
0
0
0
—
0
0
1
2
0
0
6
6
50.0
18
15:50
1:49
0:54
1
0
+1
0
2
50.0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
—
20
15:42
1:33
0:00
0
0
+1
0
1
0.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
9
7
56.3
21
15:36
2:08
0:34
0
0
−1
2
3
0.0
0
0
3
0
1
0
4
0
100.0
17
15:20
2:11
0:00
0
0
−1
0
2
0.0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
—
18
14:12
0:00
0:31
0
0
0
0
1
0.0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
100.0
17
12:16
0:00
0:48
0
0
0
0
1
0.0
0
0
3
0
0
0
2
1
66.7
15
10:51
0:00
0:52
0
0
−1
0
1
0.0
0
0
3
1
0
0
1
2
33.3
15
10:11
0:00
0:21
0
0
−2
0
1
0.0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
2
33.3
12
8:52
0:00
0:00
Goaltending
SOGA
MIN
PIM
18
4
14
.778
60:00
0
How these lines are found — from the shift charts, numbered by time together, not a coach’s depth chart

Every shift each player took in the game is lined up against everyone else’s, using the NHL’s own shift charts. Only five-on-five time with both goalies in net counts, so power plays and penalty kills do not split a line. Line 1 is the three forwards who spent the most of that time on the ice together, line 2 the most of the rest, and so on; defence pairs the same way.

A group that never took a full shift together, about a minute, is not called a line: its players are listed as also played. A game is used only when every skater’s time in the shift chart is within 30 seconds of the box score, so a chart the NHL published incomplete is skipped rather than read.

A power-play unit is the same five skaters on the ice together while the club had five skaters to the other side’s four or three; a penalty-kill unit is four skaters together while short a man. The second unit is the best group that shares at most one player with the first, since one player often plays on both. Power-play and short-handed time follow the penalties, not an empty net: a goalie pulled for an extra attacker at even strength is still even strength.

The box score is the NHL’s own, except four figures it does not publish. Short-handed goals and faceoffs won and lost come from the play-by-play, which is used only when it reproduces the box score’s goals, power-play goals and faceoff percentages exactly; power-play and short-handed ice time come from the shift chart.

From the last 7 days · newest first

News

  1. Lineup

    Blackhawks Vs Bruins: Projected Lineup, How To Watch, & More Ahead Of Game 15 (external site)

    The Hockey News - Chicago Blackhawks via Yahoo Sports ·

    In this story: Boston Bruins, Chicago Blackhawks

All Boston Bruins news

Current roster · clubs updated weekly

Roster

Per-game rates, recency-weighted over every season since 2021-22. Skaters are listed by Adj. P, points per game pulled toward the league average when the sample is small; the other rates are the recorded ones.

Forwards: per-game rates
Forwards#Adj. PPTSGA
David Pastrnak881.271.280.480.803.74442
Morgan Geekie390.710.710.350.361.87422
Pavel Zacha180.700.710.280.431.69429
Elias Lindholm280.670.670.250.421.86433
James Hagens440.630.640.300.331.7919
JJ Peterka100.620.630.300.332.03340
Casey Mittelstadt110.580.580.210.371.32385
Matthew Poitras510.490.490.220.271.2280
Fraser Minten930.450.450.220.231.57127
Alex Steeves210.350.350.190.151.2659
Marat Khusnutdinov920.340.340.160.190.85188
Riley Duran620.310.000.000.002.502
Lukas Reichel760.300.290.110.191.03199
Michael Eyssimont810.280.270.130.151.90279
Mark Kastelic470.270.270.120.151.17307
Tanner Jeannot840.260.250.090.160.98387
Sean Kuraly520.250.250.090.161.30384
Brendan Gaunce500.220.200.070.131.1296
Ivan Ivan490.190.170.090.090.7249
Brian Halonen480.160.120.060.060.5219
Defence: per-game rates
Defence#Adj. PPTSGA
Charlie McAvoy730.720.730.140.591.75378
Frederic Brunet420.400.390.100.290.8311
Hampus Lindholm270.380.380.080.301.49352
Mason Lohrei60.370.360.090.271.02219
Billy Sweezey580.330.110.000.110.339
Nikita Zadorov910.280.280.040.231.27437
Henri Jokiharju200.270.270.050.221.07297
Jordan Harris430.240.230.060.170.82173
Maxence Guenette380.240.000.000.000.938
Will Borgen170.230.220.070.150.93387
Jonathan Aspirot450.210.200.040.160.8071
Connor Clifton750.180.180.030.140.88360
Goalies: per-game rates
Goalies#
Michael DiPietro30.9411.4423.124.551:445
Jiri Patera31.8684.6830.935.554:559
Jeremy Swayman1.9072.6425.628.358:43271
How these rates are built — the club is their current one, re-checked weekly; the rates span every season since 2021-22

Each player is listed under the club the NHL had them on when we last checked, and clubs are re-checked once a week: a player traded in the last few days can still appear under their previous club, while the rates beside them span every season since 2021-22, wherever they played them. Each rate is a recency-weighted per-game average, and Sample is the number of games it rests on.

Skaters are ordered by a points rate shrunk toward the league average in proportion to how little a player has played, so a one-game sample does not out-rank a career. That rate is Adj. P; PTS and the other columns are the recorded rates, and for anyone with a real sample Adj. P and PTS are nearly the same number. Save percentage is total saves over total shots, weighted, not the average of per-game save percentages, which would count a two-shot relief appearance as heavily as a forty-shot start.

2026-27 cap · 2025-26 production

Best cap efficiency

Best cap efficiency on this club: points per $1M of cap hit
#SkaterCap hitClub controlPTSPTS / $1M
1Fraser MintenC82$0.88M1 yrRFA3539.8
2Marat KhusnutdinovC77$0.93M1 yrRFA3335.7
3Jonathan AspirotD61$0.89M2 yrsUFA1314.6
4Mark KastelicC82$1.57M2 yrsUFA2214.0
5Pavel ZachaC78$4.75M1 yrUFA6513.7

Club control counts every season a player is signed through, extensions included, so it can describe a different contract from the cap hit beside it. A player measured against the season that earned his contract looks expensive, so recent signings sit low and entry-level deals sit high, by construction. Cap efficiency across the league.